Talk:Vikki Carr

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Latin music: Regional Mexican music Mid‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Regional Mexican music task force.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Hispanic and Latino / Mexican-Americans / Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Mexican-American task force.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gay Icon Project

In my effort to merge the now-deleted list from the article Gay icon to the Gay icons category, I have added this page to the category. I engaged in this effort as a "human script", adding everyone from the list to the category, bypassing the fact-checking stage. That is what I am relying on you to do. Please check the article Gay icon and make a judgment as to whether this person or group fits the category. By distributing this task from the regular editors of one article to the regular editors of several articles, I believe that the task of fact-checking this information can be expedited. Thank you very much. Philwelch 20:16, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

George Bush

The link to George Bush in the article is a disambiguation page. Did Carr sing for George H. W. Bush or George W. Bush? GoCardinal 00:55, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can't Take My Eyes Off Of You

Is there a reason the song Can't Take My Eyes Off Of You is not mentioned on this page? It's undoubtedly her greatest hit, but isn't mentioned. Is there something I'm missing here? Cody M Wilson 13:55, 27 Mar 2007 (UTC)

It was never a chart single, although it received a lot of airplay in certain markets.

"Cant Take My Eyes Off Of You" is a standard that she covered; she did not popularize that song. (That was Frankie Valli in 1967). Vikki's bit hit, which was the same year, was "It Must Be Him". It was Number 1 in the Billboard Adult Contemporary ("easy listening") chrt. Number 3 in the US Billboard Hot 100, Number 2 in the UK Singles, and Number 1 in Australia. Nobody else recorded a hit version. That is her song.100.36.114.74 (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VikkiCarr2.jpg

Image:VikkiCarr2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VikkiCarr2.jpg

Image:VikkiCarr2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Year of hit single "It Must Be Him"

The Career section is correct in stating "The title track reached No. 3 on the Billboard Hot 100 in the United States in 1967." I've verified this in the Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits, 7th Edition by Joel Whitburn (Pg 110) which has the peak date of this song as 9/30/67.

However, both the Chart Singles and Singles Grid of this article had the song incorrectly placed in 1966. I've corrected the year of this hit and The Lesson and With Pen In Hand in the list of Singles, but the grid I'll leave for someone else. GaryZ45RPM (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"It Must Be Him" was first released as a single in September, 1966. The single charted first on the U.K charts, but did not chart enter the US Hot 100. It was re-released with a different flip side in July 1967 and that single debuted on the Hot 100 in September 1967. all of her singles discography along with release dates can be found at [1]

Nearly all of the singles discographies on Wikipedia list by the year that the single was released, not the year that it peaked on the chart. (I prefer using peak dates, but to try to change the way it is done here is a losing uphill battle). For this song, it was released and entered the British chart in 1966. Perhaps a note at the end of the table explaining that the song entered and peaked on the Hot 100 in 1967 would be the best in this case? BurienBomber (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explaination. I have restored the Release years for those songs and added a note stating Release Year not Peak Year. Take a look. Also added note to the Singles Grid section. I toyed with the idea of changing the "Year" column heading to "Release Year", but couldn't figure out how to get "Year" to wrap under "Release".GaryZ45RPM (talk) 13:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some further work on the article. Two or three points though. Firstly, surely the discography lists and tables need to be combined - it is presently largely a duplication and rather confusing. Secondly, the whole article is short of references (even after my efforts). Lastly, I wonder about the validity of some chart placings when I see a chart position for Hoy of #203, in a chart that is labelled Billboard 200 ! A cited reference source might help to remove any suspicions. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 12:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies to WurmWoode, who just did some work improving the "charting singles" section, but it makes no sense to have these two sections, singles & charting singles, which is just duplicate information. I combined the info into one table, using the US chart positions from the "charting singles" table, which are all correct, but still need to be sourced: the Billboard.com website only goes back to around 1983. I eliminated the "Mexico" column as there were no figures in that column. If someone at a later date wants to research & include Mexican chart positions, a new column can be added at that time.--Nyctc7 (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also tweaked the albums chart: abbreviated the chart names for a cleaner look, removed the "Latin Pop" charting albums from the "Top Latin" column to avoid confusion: "Latin Pop" postion is in the "comments" section. Hoy is not a Billboard top 200 album.--Nyctc7 (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No personal information

There is practically no personal information about Carr on this page. All I see are her birth name and the date and city in the infobox. This is strange for a performer. Does no one know anything about her childhood, family, marriage(s), children, interests besides show business, etc? It would be good to have something here about the person, in addition to the extensive information about her career. From a few old interviews I've seen online, she seems to be extraordinarily well-balanced for a celebrity, and it would be good to know more about how she managed to accomplish that, assuming it is true.--Jim10701 (talk) 23:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I came here to see if she was of Mexican origin. Is she? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Married Three times

Dann Moss (1966 - 1974) Michael Nielsson (1979-1992) Pedro De Leon (1993- 2019 (his death) http://porterloring.tributes.com/obituary/show/Pedro-A.-De-Leon-107932317

https://www.brainandlife.org/the-magazine/online-exclusives/singer-vikki-carr-shares-lessons-in-caregiving-and-love/

67.0.49.75 (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vikki Carr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090617152343/http://www.grammy.com/grammy%5FAwards/Winners/ to http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vikki Carr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birth Date Error

I notice Vikki's birth date appears as July 19, 1941 in the introductory section but as exactly a year earlier, July 19, 1940, in the photo-panel Background Information. Probably someone has irrefutable evidence on the matter and can bring the dates in line. Humboles (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]