Talk:Second EDSA Revolution

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Second EDSA Revolution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Starting this off

I finally started an article about EDSA II (it's about time). But I'm not exactly sure if the article should be under this name. Simply calling it "EDSA II" seems a bit colloquial. TheCoffee 19:11, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think that the title is good enough. If you're wondering about colloquiality look no further than Bill Clinton. --seav 05:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The last two sentences seem baseless: "This revolution is also considered as a revolution of rich Filipino people of 2001. Many rich personalities joined in this revolution." Consider removing these sentences or adding supporting statistics/reports.--Mendz 07:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Impeachment article

Is there an article on Erap's impeachment proceedings? Seems like one of those must-have history articles. Shrumster 16:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC) Philstar.com had a website's worth of tidbits. Dunno if the wayback machine saved those. --Howard the Duck 15:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Php bill 200 back.jpg

The image Image:Php bill 200 back.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough discussion on underlying causes in article

The Trial of Joseph Estrada where he was found guilty of certain offenses would seem relevant. The reasons given for his ouster are given short shrift but there was a large number of reasons for discontent that this article glosses over. Lambanog (talk) 05:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charges which led to the trial weren't filed until several months after the events recounted in this article were done with, and the verdict wasn't handed down until nearly seven years later. I don't see much relevance. I've just fixed the dead link to the book in the Further reading section of the article[1]; I happen to have a copy of that book, and it provides some info about the situation leading up to and surrounding the events recounted in this article in more depth that this article provides. It's not previewable online, though. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the {{POV}} tag. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Reyes

The article doesn't mention Angelo Reyes -- he has to mentioned although I don't know when he withdrew support. Maybe on the third or last day? –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Envelope? "Second" envelope? What?

Serious work needed on explaining things. E.g., "the second envelope" appears in the text out of the blue. What is it? What envelope was voted on, etc.? 71.200.28.21 (talk) 23:50, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed moving EDSA Revolution → EDSA Revolution (disambiguation)

I've proposed moving EDSA Revolution → EDSA Revolution (disambiguation) and redirecting EDSA Revolution to point to this article. Since editors of this article might be interested I post a note here. Please do not discuss here but rather at Talk:EDSA Revolution. --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Apparently uncontroversial. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2001 EDSA Revolution → EDSA II – Consistency with EDSA III. Charles Essie (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Also, "EDSA III" was also an EDSA Revolution that happened in 2001, so that should help clear up things. –H T D 17:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:EDSA III which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:30, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

EDSAShrinejf0107 14.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

First Inauguration of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]