Talk:Bullet with Butterfly Wings

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Alternative music: Smashing Pumpkins Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of The Smashing Pumpkins task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Untitled

Songs and singles at AMG get seperate pages. The song's review was favorable, but the single's wasn't. [1] -- LGagnon 01:25, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

Do you think it would be more appropriate to link to the single page? As it is now it's confusing; reader sees "2.5 stars", clicks link, and finds a favorable review. I guess the optimal solution would be to link to both pages, somehow. --Dbenbenn 02:03, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Alternative metal?

While I certainly believe that "Bullet with Butterfly Wings" is a relatively heavy song, I don't think it's quite that heavy. Perhaps "alternative metal" could be replaced with "hard rock?" --Dylan 620 (contribs, logs) 20:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative rock sums up the song fine. The Pumpkins have never been categorized as an alternative metal band. Quite a few alt-rock bands have metal influences without being alternative metal, Nirvana and Pearl Jam being the other most prominent examples. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was contesting the song's categorization as alternative metal when I wrote my post - apparently it has since been removed. --Dylan620 ^{(I'm all ears)} 00:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The song itself, to me, sounds very Grungy and hard rockish. Maybe too raw to simply be labelled under the umbrella term for Alternative Rock. Alternative Metal sounds just about right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.102.96 (talk) 08:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC) Agreed. This is very Grungy, angst lyrics, harsh distorted guitar sounds in the main chorus. I'm adding in Grunge in the Genre type; if anyone is willing to provide a source/citation for Alternative Rock then please do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pentrazemine (talk • contribs) 21:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough. This is Grunge not just Alternative Rock.

This song fits the Grunge criteria perfectly. Raw, angsty lyrics. Distorted guitar vocals, hard drums. Alternative Rock is too broad. Just because a band is known as an Alternative Rock band doesn't mean some of their songs can't fit certain sub-criteria's. I'm adding in Grunge. This is 100% Grunge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pentrazemine (talk • contribs) 02:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre changes

Nearly all of the edits over the past several years have been genre changes. It seems this is the only attraction as far as editing goes, but really, it's a problem with all music related articles. Changes seem to rotate around combinations of alternative rock, alternative metal, hard rock and grunge. The fact is this kind of classification is highly subjective. I'm not sure what the best course of action should be... maybe just include all of the aforementioned genres? — MusikAnimal ^talk 04:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this song (which is one of my favourites) is difficult to pin down for genres. It was written that way. When I listen to the music and the vocals, I can identify all the genres you have listed. I would affirm them all as absolutely this song. The "rat in a cage" chorus is decidedly metal and grunge for me. But "highly subjective" quickly brings us to "original research". I am in favour of having alt rock, alt metal, grunge and hard rock listed as genres as long as we have sources. I am an inclusionist for multiple genres. Fylbecatulous talk 05:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we would add any genres to this page without sources. If you can find sources, I'm 100% fine with changing to anything they say. But without them we should stick to the genre of the parent album, which is alternative rock. hbent (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We of course should only add sourced genres. Per this discussion I've added back hard rock, for which it was very easy to find a source. Low and behold "alternative metal" was not so easy... and I had a feeling it wouldn't be. Side unrelated note: I've changed this discussion back to indentation format rather than a list, as we're sort of replying to each other, as opposed to !voting in a survey. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bullet with Butterfly Wings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bullet with Butterfly Wings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Akira imagery

Watching the video, the repeated scene of Billy Corgan on the thrown really evokes Tetsuo from Akira. Not sure if this has been discussed anywhere, but with "Anim..." Written on the wall behind it, kinda hard to ignore for me. 198.91.167.152 (talk) 02:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"though it is likely in the context of the interview that these statements were sarcastic"

I would strike this phrase from the article as original research, except that it is the (unintentionally, presumably) funniest thing I've read in a mainspace wikipedia article in ages. CAVincent (talk) 04:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Despite all my rage" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Despite all my rage has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 27 § Despite all my rage until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]