Talk:Montgomery, Illinois
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
History
[edit]Edited the history section, it could still use improvement. I noticed that the book listed as a reference is at the local library. I'll be checking it out to further flesh out the section. TANSTAAFL (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Montgomery, Illinois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Z8UlwK5e?url=http://www.y115.org/vnews/display.v/SEC/District?template=m to http://www.y115.org/vnews/display.v/SEC/District?template=m
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Racial profiling
[edit]In regards to the 2009 racial profiling source by the Montgomery police. I'm obviously new at this and may still be going on about this in the wrong way.
How is this information from a town perspective relative. Police departments receive complaints, all the time, so do we need to publish every single one on the towns history now. This is the village history not the history of the police department. One man claiming a racist remark was made to him, and uses a video from the officers dash-cam that does NOT contain a racist remark. It's not relative to the history of the village. The reason it should be removed because it is not relevant, the complainant only added it because they had a personal grudge. I'm not sure how it got approved in the first place. Are we going to post every complaint, that gets published to the newspaper. its unnecessary, and bias C.O.D 02/26/19 1:18pm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.203.137.196 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- I actually agree that this isn't important to the history. Removed. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)