Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Traduki
Of all planned languages (not really "artificial", since the words they use have " real" language etymologies, , Esperanto seems to be the one that has been able to make more progress. Many works of literature have been translated into Esperanto, and there are probably more accurate bilingual dictionaries in which Esperanto is one of the languages than other bilingual dictionaries. It is more difficult to find a word in a decent, hypothetical dictionary, say, Finnish-Tagalog (if it exists) than to find the same way through a system of dictionaries Esperanto-Tagalog and Esperanto-Finnish. A computer that has both can translate faster and with more accuracy.
I think that to delete would deprive the public of important information.
Thank you for asking.
R. García Bárcena
Director
Inlingua Schools - Puerto Rico
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traduki page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traduki" page.
