Talk:Beyond the Valley of the Dolls

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled comments

As far as I know the New York Dolls got their name from a shop called 'the hospital for new york dolls', not this movie...?

It was either the Doll Hospital, The original Valley... movie, or the pills that they were addicted to in the original movie. Those pills were known as reds, DOLLS, and downers.JBDay 22:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to categorize the film?

The introductory paragraph calls BVD an American musical comedy, but I'm not sure this is quite accurate. Roger Ebert says Russ Meyer wanted a comedy/musical/horror/melodrama/camp script. So I'm wondering if the way BVD is described in the article about the novel Valley of the Dolls — "a satirical pastiche" — would better describe the film. Or should it be called a comedy/musical/horror/melodrama/camp extravaganza? Anyone? Kinkyturnip (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about, a film that was made so as to be virtually unclassifiable? Classifications are naturally possible, but by grotesquely combining such very different movie genres, the result is such a ridiculous chimaera as to both satirise and ridicule the commercial movie-making industry -- Hollywood itself.

Nuttyskin (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Nuttyskin (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marcia McBroom

...is on Wikipedia:List of encyclopedia topics (44) so she needs one of:

An article
A redirect to here if it's her only film
or to be placed on the "No article needed" section at Wikipedia:List of encyclopedia topics (44).

--kingboyk (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me that you aren't going around adding redlinks on the basis of that list of thousands and thousands of potential subjects without actually evaluating the subject?

In any case, she's non-notable, and I've moved her. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Err... You are familiar with the "User Contributions" feature aren't you? You can see for yourself that I'm not. It's also a requirement to be civil round here, so all you needed to say was that you consider her non notable and that you've put her into the "no article needed" and that would be that. And people wonder why I got sick of this place?!

Wikipedia:List_of_encyclopedia_topics: "The following is a list of encyclopedia topics that do not appear to have articles in Wikipedia, but really should for maximum coverage. The intent is to create a sensible article with the given link - many being redirects - and then to remove it from these pages. Thus each page of the list should get steadily shorter. There are certain links which may be better not having pages created for them. An explanation for this should be noted next to the link and it moved to the bottom of the page." It's quite reasonable for me to assume that a name on that list should have an article, and quite reasonable for you to respond by moving the name off the main list. Over and out. --kingboyk (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A name on the list simply means that some editor at some time - perhaps a fan of McBroom - thought she should have an article. It should not be taken to be a list of all the unlinked names on Wikipedia that should be redlinked. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture

Regarding this edit, where does Wikipedia policy say that it is acceptable for "IPC items" to be "sourced by the media item they refer to"? Perhaps Beyond My Ken has forgotten that Wikipedia is not meant to be used as a source? I added the citation needed tags as an alternative to removing that information altogether, but if BMK is going to reject the tags, then perhaps it should be simply removed. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207193841/http://www.film.com:80/features/story/mondo-culto-beyond-valley-dolls/21728390 to http://www.film.com/features/story/mondo-culto-beyond-valley-dolls/21728390

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]