Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemetschek

Orphaned, poorly written one-sentence advertisement article on a CAD company, with extlink. Lupo 11:03, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I've separated this listing off from the one above for Nemetscheck, because some of the comments are no longer valid, and it was just getting confusing. - IMSoP 13:32, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

[Summary: Keep] Repeating that Lupo initially commented on Nemetscheck rather than Nemetschek. My first idea was to suggest the same on cleanup, but it's present version isn't really worse than many other stubs on CAD companies .. anyways, if it's the external link that is bothering, one might as well remove that. -- User:Docu
Keep. 166,000 google hits (didn't check all but top 20 were all about the company). Could be sufficiently notable. Andris 01:23, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
Seems notable in their field. Article is a bit small, but keep anyway. -- Cyrius|&#9998 04:07, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
This is Wikispam ~~and a duplicate of the Nemetscheck article cited above for deletion.~~ Alcarillo 16:01, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- [~~Strikeout~~ added by IMSoP in disentangling the two listings]
I'd like to point out that I did not ever list Nemetschek. I listed Nemetscheck (note the spelling) before it was turned into a redirect by IMSoP. Later I commented on Nemetscheck that it was a superfluous duplicate anyway, but that should not be construed to mean that I wanted Nemetschek to be deleted! If I had wanted that, I would have listed it separately. Lupo 09:23, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, my mistake. Somebody listed it, and they used the MediaWiki page that you'd already made for the other listing. In disentangling them I guess I assumed it was you who'd made both listings; I apologise if that was incorrect. Would the real lister of this article please stand up? - IMSoP 15:22, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]