Talk:Red-handed

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Mammals

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles

Primates

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

Untitled

Article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 2 to July 10 2004, consensus was not reached over what to do with it. Discussion:

I can see the benefit of having a template that can be used to link wikipedia articles with articles in sister projects about the same thing, but these two articles consist solely of that link. These are not articles IMO and the only reason I haven't speedily deleted them is that I'm not sure of the policy on the use of this template. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 13:54, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Given that the template was created yesterday, I think we're going to have to set policy. I think it's a bad idea. If we want something like this, it needs to be handled programmatically. Trying to do this by hand is not going to work very well. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:06, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I found another one: Edit. If these were articles that only contained a link to another language wiki, or just a category and nothing else I would deleted them on sight so to be honest I don't see how these are any different. All three were created by Patrick. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 13:38, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  - I was inspired and encouraged by WP:PUMP#What_content_should_we_have_here.3F and Flagrante delicto. Of course these are not articles. They are more like a redirect, but not an actual one, because interwiki redirects have some disadvantages. It provides more integration between projects: if I am looking for info about a topic and there is no article in Wikipedia, than it is better than nothing to have a dictionary definition at Wiktionary, and perhaps it is a starting point for writing an article. But I agree that an automatic way would be better.--Patrick 19:16, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete - Tεx τ urε 03:33, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

End discussion