Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholic
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipediholic page. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This project page was nominated for deletion on 2004-11-20. The result of the discussion was kept. |
Adding WP:Beyond the end
[edit]We could add as part of Level V or IV that they wish for the end of the world so WP:Beyond the end can happen. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I removed from Level IV, Level V may work but, maybe better yet, make your dark thought a stand-alone Level VI (although the linked essay isn't funny and needs work). Randy Kryn (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- p.s. well, a bit funny, I like your Louvre link. Has potential if funnified (for Level VI). Randy Kryn (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thats funny to me, its also just about the least dark take on the end of the world possible... I don't actually think its dark. Could go in level IV or V. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Randy Kryn How is it now? I expanded it. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Better, liking the images. C'mon, Level VI or bust (Level V at least, as it is an 'ending'). Hcoder3104, mind if I join in editing the lead or is it a personal project? 'hanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Randy Kryn Of course you can edit it! Also, about the Level VI, I don't believe an entire new section is warrented for a single article. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Better, liking the images. C'mon, Level VI or bust (Level V at least, as it is an 'ending'). Hcoder3104, mind if I join in editing the lead or is it a personal project? 'hanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- p.s. well, a bit funny, I like your Louvre link. Has potential if funnified (for Level VI). Randy Kryn (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Humor?
[edit]I understand this idea of a wiki addiction can be humorous to some, but I don't think should be dismissed purely as humor. Wikipedia can be addictive, and we should acknowledge that in a serious manner. Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 03:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- i guess, (according to this page i may be a level I wikipediaholic) Abdullah raji (talk) 12:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
huh, i knew what a sock puppet is but not with the name "sock puppet". i knew it as "alt" because that's how they call it on forums and i'm very active on them. also yes, i made account to post this without showing my ip
- edit: i scored 31, some of those points come from other wikis but whatever haha What was the glider's apgcode? (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)