Talk:Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / Canadian / European / French / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

NATO (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eisenhower?

This article needs more on the early history of SHAPE. Where's Eisenhower? ---204.196.238.252 20:31, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shape big.gif

Image:Shape big.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US led

i wondered if there any information on why its always US led? is it part of the Nato constitution that an american has to be in command? or has it just worked out that way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.104.87 (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These decisions on which nation gets which slot are the product of internal NATO horse-trading, from the 1950s to this day. Both SACEUR and SACLANT, it was agreed in the early 1950s, were to be American officers, and it has to be remembered that when the decisions were taken European forces were still in their rebuilding stages after World War II. The Chairman of the Military Committee and Secretary-General of NATO are always Europeans. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that after France rejoined the Command Structure, SACT (who used to be SACLANT until the command structure reform in 2006) became the French Air Force General Stéphane Abrial on 29 July 2009. Jackieeaton 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Andrew Goodpaster NATO photo.jpg

The image File:Andrew Goodpaster NATO photo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday SHAPE

Le commandant suprême des forces alliées en Europe (SACEUR), l’amiral américain James Stavridis, a présidé vendredi une cérémonie célébrant le 60ème anniversaire du grand quartier général des Forces alliées en Europe (SHAPE), 44 ans après son installation en Belgique, selon Soir.

Après le retrait de la France du commandement militaire de l’OTAN décidé par le général Charles de Gaulle, le SHAPE a déménagé. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.81.20.127 (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Flight1":

From Exercise Mainbrace: "The NATO Exercises, Part 1" Flight (September 26, 1952) p. 402-404.
From Allied Joint Force Command Naples: "The NATO Exercises, Part 1" Flight (September 26, 1952) p. 402-404

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not May the 4th

but I don't mind seeing Scaparrotti's name up.Cantab1985 (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Greater coat of arms of Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (1955-1966).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Organization

I would like to point out that this article has two reference sections. I do not believe this is a generally accepted practice for Wikipedia articles. If I am mistaken, please feel free to correct me. 27.125.165.242 (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]