Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Concorde/Archive

Concorde

Comprehensive and interesting. The photos are the highlight. I've made minor edits to the article, not enough to call it a self-nomination IMO, but there you are. Tempshill 22:00, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Object, no references. 119 23:40, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Strong Object. ALKIVAR™ 04:12, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- No references
- Majority of article content is lists
- Section on Paris Crash is too small

it has its own articleWolfKeeper 00:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Other crashes/major accidents not covered

That's because there weren't anyWolfKeeper 00:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- No mention of how staff casually overlooked things like the "5 mile high club" and the "what happens onboard stays onboard" mentality of passengers and staff. (I've heard some rather interesting stories about in flight activity).

This does not seem to me to be critical; I checked and there was no obvious information on this anywhere, that would constitute a rumour anyway, and would be uncitable.WolfKeeper 00:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Needs a copyedit/spellcheck.