Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchypedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 22:52, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Self-promotion partly from User:Hierarchypedia for 4-month old website with 17 registered users. Less than 500 hits, and an Alexa rank of 1,432,947. Niteowlneils 22:53, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete seems like a neat site, but keeping anything with so few registered users would create a very dangerous precident. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:53, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, advertisement. Megan1967 00:53, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep : this is not an advertisement. I started this article myself, before I had anything to do with the site. At that time, I was planning to do articles on a number of wikis that appeared to have some content (but have been waylaid of late - too busy). I do hope the community will be broad-minded enough to appreciate the value of the article, which does, after all, only state facts about the website. It does not in any way promote it, in my opinion. (I don't pretend to be neutral - I am an admin on Hierarchypedia - but that came after writing this article, not before. At that time, I wasn't even involved with Hierarchypedia in any way).
- Keep. The Recycling Troll 18:13, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Concur with Niteowl, delete. The issue is not whether the article is neutral; the issue is that there's millions of websites, and we don't want descriptions for all or even most of them. Radiant! 12:15, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I predict that it will become pretty notable at sometime in the future, but it is not notable now. →Iñgōlemo← talk 05:12, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC)
- Hi, this is my website, just a note. It is not promotion, as I didn't star the article. It was started by Davidcannon. I will have no ill feeling if it is deleted --Hierarchypedia 01:38, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.