Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Warld

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete A4. Essjay · Talk 06:54, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Lost Warld

This page has already been deleted once, and has simply been reposted with no new content, as noted by DoubleCross on the talk page. I therefore formally propose that it is deleted again. ThomasHarte 23:07, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Delete. Colin M. 23:09, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per CSD:General Section 4. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to say Speedy as per Fernando Rizo, but I think it could be a useful Redirect to Hideo Kojima. Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 23:29, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

.

Original discussion of deletion follows:

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Warld

I think this article seems more like a footnote for the Hideo Kojima article than something that deserves a whole page. Considering that:

Very little or no information is availble about the game other than what Kojima has stated in various interviews.

The game is unreleased and will probably stay that way for quite awhile.

What does anyone else thinks?

Jonny2x4 03:09, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) (This article was first nominated on April 24, 2005, but was never listed on vfd. You (Talk) July 6, 2005 22:03 (UTC))

Keep all commercial computer and video games. You 18:04, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Completely useless; it could be (and basically already is) summed up in the Kojima article without any problem. --DoubleCross 06:53, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. NN. 1980s Game that was never published, so not a "commerical" game. --A D Monroe III 6 July 2005 23:19 (UTC)
All non-notable unreleased games from the 1980's unconnected with scandals or other newsworthy events should be deleted.--Scimitar 6 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)
Delete per DoubleCross. Dcarrano July 6, 2005 23:47 (UTC)
Delete non notable gamescruft. JamesBurns 7 July 2005 08:23 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.