Talk:Carl's Afternoon in the Park
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This reads like a book review, which is nice, but it doesn't express a neutral point of view. Some countervailing opinions would seem appropriate. --Kelly Martin 02:32, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
A very fair point. I'm tempted to read this book if only to overhaul the entry. Perhaps someone familiar with the work could come in instead? I feel that this (depending on the traffic it receives) is more a case for deletion until someone can come along and pen something truly worthwhile. -- Steve McFarland 02:02, March 26, 2005 (PST)
- I tried rewriting it, as a result I think it's more NPOV but less well written. --CVaneg 07:04, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think we should get too extreme about NPOV... wiki consensus seems to be that any commercially published book is notable and deserving of an entry, but do we really need a full literary analysis and critique? I'll pull the NPOV flag, since there's nothing along the lines of "this is the best book ever" in the article right now. Feco 05:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)