Jump to content

Talk:Charles Best (medical scientist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2020 and 13 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tomhlane.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Thee Charles Best page ignores the damning evidence found in Michael bliss 1982 book "The discovery of Insulin" and his 1993 article "Rewriting Medical History: Charles Best and the Banting and Best myth" in the Journal of the history of Medicine and allied sciences. There is an excellent chapter relating to the true story of insulin`s discovery(and not the Best fantasy which is being peddled here) in John Waller`s 2002 book "Fabulous Science-fact and fiction in the history of scientific discovery"

Stevenscollege 3/6/05

I have started to change the page, I substituted "vital" with the more accurate "small" in the first paragraph and tried to explain the nobel Controversy which isnt a Controversy at all. In fact I have taken the link to the controversy page out.


Stevenscollege 3/6/05

why would you do that???? best was involved so it is a controversy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.3.161 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 21 December 2006

"Rewriting Medical History: Charles Best and the Banting and Best Myth" by Michael Bliss can be found online. –panda (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


First: Best almost certainly wasn't old enough, knowledgeable or experienced enough to have discovered insulin without Banting. Like these two, many people help senior scientists do their research; actually doing the work isn't qualification enough to win a Nobel. The way it was almost always done in those days was for the senior scientist to get the prize. He who gets the prestige, money and equipment together to enable the research usually walks away with everything. That's the way it works everywhere. Who built the Panama canal, the Hoover Dam? The Trans-Siberia Railroad? Not the guys who got credit for them.
Want to see a really annoying example in science? read about astronomer Henrietta_Swan_Leavitt; her *extremely* important discovery was how to measure the distance to stars. Edwin Hubble =himself= said she should have won a Nobel (but then Hubble didn't get a Nobel until after his death either).
Another: Shockley got a Nobel for the transistor, because he was the leader of the group, not because he actually did the hard work. Twang (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Charles Herbert Best. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Charles Best (medical scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_Best_(medical_scientist)&oldid=1206271961"