Jump to content

Talk:Credenda/Agenda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes

[edit]

For a September 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Credenda/Agenda


The "published irregularly" blurb was my own error; I read their publication page wrong. It's published bi-montly, as it has been since 1988.

I also plan to expand this article more; the magazine is quite popular and quite controversial in Conservative Christian circles.

RPW

[edit]

Can someone supply a reference supporting the statement that C/A promotes the "rejection of the Calvinist doctrine known as the regulative principle of worship"? I found references to the RPW in C/A, but they seemed to point more toward a different perspective on the doctrine rather than an outright rejection of it.


Controversy

[edit]

I think the controversy section is a bit shabby. Paedocommunion is already mentioned above, and high church liturgy isn't all that controversial except in micropresbyterian denominations (the conservative Presbyterian Church in America allows it, for instance). The criticism/controversy should be cited from reliable sources, but it should be with regard to C/A's particular position, not high church liturgy in general. I think the section could be integrated into the rest of the article without the big heading since there doesn't seem to be all that much controversy about the magazine itself. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did add the bit about high church liturgy only as an attempt to clarify the existing, vague objection about the regulative principle, which was added by the creator of the article. Anyway, let's go ahead with the suggested changes. (PS, I notice you sometimes use bullet points in your responses. May I humbly recommend that you use only colons except on AfDs and the like - cf. WP:TPG#Layout?) --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. StAnselm 14:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Credenda/Agenda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Credenda/Agenda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]