Talk:University of Warwick Students' Union
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Students' Union / Association sabs list deletion
[edit]- I've started a discussion on
Chriscf's Talk Pageas this involve all the union's page. Please go there to provide your opinion if you're interested. -- KTC 16:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)- I will be removing the above discussion from my talk page. User talk pages are for personal communication. They are not for conducting general content debates. Feel free to start a discussion in the Wikipedia namespace, but this is not an appropriate discussion for user pages. Chris talk back 16:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Discussion was needed because of your unilateral deletion on multiple pages. So in a sense, your talk page does fit for purpose. Anyhow, it's now at Talk:Students Union -- KTC 03:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- I will be removing the above discussion from my talk page. User talk pages are for personal communication. They are not for conducting general content debates. Feel free to start a discussion in the Wikipedia namespace, but this is not an appropriate discussion for user pages. Chris talk back 16:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Warwick Student Cinema
[edit]Firstly, it being the 'largest' society in the Union is somewhat contentious, as its 'members' are in practice 'users'. Thoughts?
Also, this section is about the Union's buildings, and WSC (as stated) isn't in them. So is its inclusion irrelevant? -- CyberCD 13th April 2006
Societies
[edit]I have added some more information, linking to the full list of Societies and Clubs running at present.--Shastrix 13:58, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Updated the number of socities and sports clubs as well as correcting the links for each. --Shastrix 19:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Somebody really has an axe to grind, don't they?
[edit]Why should the "criticism" section go into such detail on points that can be and are leveled (rightly or wrongly) at pretty much any student political organisation? Low turnout, the rather odd nature of Sabb positions, and so on are hardly unique to Warwick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.82.83.149 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. It's a bit ridiculous to have such a long list, especially as none of the gripes have been cited. If it doesn't get sorted out soon, I'll trim the section. 82.3.220.150 (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
large amount of content removed
[edit]Large amount of content removed by JamesBWatson] "(Removing content which is of interest perhaps to members, but not of general encyclopaedic value. This is an encyclopaedia article, not a prospectus or brochure for the union.)"
I feel that some of this content was encyclopaedic and should be reinstated.