Talk:Elder High School

United States: Ohio / Cincinnati Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

For February 2005 deletion debate, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Elder High School. Decision was unambiguosly KEEP. jni 09:19, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Removed anonomous post. Mfields1 09:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it has recently been editted, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: Well its a good start length. Importance low although there are few alumni. Some pictures and more breadth. Notes good but some more referencing. Hope this helps. Victuallers 22:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable persons

I removed Brian Roether from the notability section. The Technology section is vague and notability is not demonstrated for Mr. Roether. No disrespect to him personally but all the other alumnus have publicly distinguished themselves and a web search for Brian Roether reveals nothing about the Hamtramck Computer related to Brian Roether. Editor at anonymous IP: Please discuss on this talk page the reasons for adding Brian Roether. Mfields1 01:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.27.3 (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Elderlogo.jpg

Image:Elderlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elder High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De facto segregation

Hello PaulinSaudi -- Your recent edit, reverted by John from Idegon, is intended to show that the student body of the the school is not representative of the local community. That's a fair observation, but one that will cause consternation. We have a bunch of articles with similar assertions, for example, North Sunflower Academy. When the claim is bold, the references need to be bulletproof. For enrollment statistics, the more frequently cited is NCES [1]. All of the other commercial school sites copy from this, the closest we have to an authoritative source, primary as it is. In 2016, Elder had thirty-five black students and nineteen of two or more races in a student body of 868. That's 4.0% or 6.2% before you jump into the thorny question of whether Hispanics self-identify as white or something else. We just need to make sure the math is correct. Rhadow (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Let me poke around. ''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me. I copyedited it to specify date for school stats, corrected tense, removed phrasing "reported as" and rephrased "White, non-Hispanic" to non-Hispanic white. Thanks Paul. John from Idegon (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]