Jump to content

Talk:Bolivia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Aircraft Inventory

[edit]
Aircraft Origin Type Versions In service[1] Notes
Trainers
Aerotec T-23 Uirapuru  Brazil trainer T-23 7
k-8  China trainer K-8 6
Beechcraft T-34 Mentor  United States trainer FMA T-34B 21
Canadair T-33 Silver Star  Canada Attack/Trainer AT-33A 19
Lancair 320  United States trainer 1
NEIVA T-25 Universal  Brazil trainer 6
Pilatus PC-7 Turbo Trainer  Switzerland trainer 9
Helicopters
AS 350 B3  France utility helicopter 2
Eurocopter AS 532 Cougar  France transport 2
Aérospatiale SA 315 Lama  France utility helicopter SA 315B 2 one was suffered an accident months ago, 4 people died at least
Bell UH-1 Iroquois  United States utility helicopter UH-1H 12
Bell UH-1 Iroquois  United States utility helicopter UH-1H 15
Bell 212 Twin Huey  United States utility helicopter 14
Transports
Basler BT-67  United States transport 1 An upgraded turboprop powered DC-3
Beechcraft Baron  United States Utility 55 2
Beechcraft Bonanza  United States utility V35 2
Beechcraft King Air  United States staff transport Super King Air 200 4
BAE Systems 146  United Kingdom transport 146–100 4
CASA C-212 Aviocar  Spain transport 3
Cessna 152  United States utility 10
Cessna 172 Skyhawk  United States utility 172K 2
Cessna 185 Skywagon  United States utility 2
Cessna 206 Stationair  United States utility 11
Cessna 210 Centurion  United States utility 4
Cessna 310  United States utility 1
Cessna 402  United States utility 402B 1
Cessna 421 Golden Eagle  United States utility 421B 1
Convair 580  United States transport 2
Fokker F27 Friendship  Netherlands transport F27-400M 4
Learjet 25  United States VIP transport 25B
25D
1
1
Lockheed C-130 Hercules  United States transport C-130A
C-130B
C-130H
2
4
1
McDonnell Douglas DC-10  United States transport DC-10-10F /DC-10-30F 2 acquired in late 2007[2]
Piper PA-34 Seneca  United States utility 2
Rockwell Sabreliner  United States VIP transport Sabreliner 60 1

References

  1. ^ Aerospace Sourcebook. Aviation Week & Space Technology 2009, 26 JAN 2009 240. Web. 14 Aug 2009.
  2. ^ Bolivian military aviation OrBat

Article contains links to "Pressenza", Russian disinfo "laundromat" fake source.

[edit]

Pressenza is a Kremlin propaganda operation run by several companies under the direction of the Russian government, known to publish extensive disinformation and fake news for the Russian state. The same link to the same article has been inserted into numerous Wikipedia articles with malicious intent or to lend credence/citation to Pressenza. It should be removed from the article. Encelix (talk) 23:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"According to the U.S. State Department, Pressenza is part of a project, run by three Russian companies, that planned to create articles in Moscow and then translate them for these “native” sites, following Chinese practice, to make them seem “local.”
See: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/06/china-russia-republican-party-relations/678271/ Encelix (talk) 23:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing coup

[edit]

I'll leave those more knowledgeable to correct errors but I just want to remind everyone not to jump the shark in making edits too quickly - someone has already changed the president to the coup leader despite the fact Lucho still seems to be in power (the situation is changing of course so I may be wrong on that). 2.30.72.156 (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Territorial losses to Argentina

[edit]

Requesting editors' views on the accuracy of the map shown here using File:Map Bolivia territorial loss-en.svg. The map here seems to show a different area, as well as this one and this one. Politheory1983 (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

[edit]

Why does the flag keep changing? I think we should stick with the flag that doesn’t have the coat of arms 2603:8080:D03:89D4:340F:F850:71E5:C9C2 (talk) 21:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The CIA Factbook says the flag has the emblem. See this. DeCausa (talk) 21:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because most of the time the article shows the flag without the emblem. I think we should add the flag with the emblem and without the emblem 2603:8080:D03:89D4:340F:F850:71E5:C9C2 (talk) 22:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's impractical. We just need to establish WP:CONSENSUS based on reliable sources which to use. I've had a look around for sources. Britannica displays the one with the emblem and describes it as the flag in the text.[1] In the caption it also says the emblem is added when displayed by the government. The CIA Factbook as I referred to above also has the version with the emblem. We need to stop this slow edit war. If consensus can't be established i this thread, I'll launch an WP:RFC. DeCausa (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]