Talk:The Sims (video game)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Sims (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Sims" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Sims (video game). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Sims (video game) at the Reference desk. |
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 8 August 2016 for a period of one week. |
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 6 April 2020 for a period of one week. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 30 January 2023 for a period of one week. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OdysseyOfGrace.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Future References
[edit]- Game Developer Magazine: August 2000 (Page 26)
- Computer Gaming World Issue 190 (Pages 64-76)
- PC Magazine
- Gamespot content:
Gathering as many references as I can find in here for a much-needed massive overhaul of this article. Will add more soon.Harryhenry1 (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Possible Copyright Violation
[edit]I have been using this source to add citations to the gameplay section, I fear in error. After re-reading the content, it seems likely that one has been largely copied and reordered from the other. The newest vresion of the article that was definetely published before the source is this version, but I do not know how to confirm which copied which, as the article has also since been changed. Any help appreciated.--CSJJ104 (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- It is organized identically to Book:The Sims and even includes infoboxes. Summary: The book you've been using is not a reliable source. --Izno (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, I am posting on behalf of my Wiki Ed Intertwine group. Me and my group were tasked with finding ways this article can be improved and wanted to note that you have made three separate citations for the source you mentioned. Since it seems to have been deemed an unreliable resource, we felt that it should be removed from the article. --Macf95 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, fellow Wikipedians! I will be reviewing and making edits to this article as part of my Technical Editing class at my university. My main focus will be reorganizing some of the content in order to reflect higher class articles on video games (specifically in the Gameplay, Compilations, and Expansions and versions sections). I will also consider adding a Cultural impact section to reflect other video game articles and from there, reorganize the Reception section. Please let me know if I need to alter my approach! OdysseyOfGrace (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
First paragraph of Development section
[edit]Could the first paragraph of the Development section possibly be moved to another page like The Sims page, or would it be best suited to stay in this article with a new section created to accommodate the information? The paragraph doesn't quite fit with the rest of the information, and it seems like other video game articles don't have as much historical information predating the game's actual creation in the Development section. OdysseyOfGrace (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Couldn't agree more. It's incredibly pretentious and difficult to understand as well. It should be edited and/or deleted completely — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7D25:AA00:E5EC:7188:995F:3B17 (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
October 25 RFDs
[edit]"Pool ladder accident" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pool ladder accident and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Pool ladder accident until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
"Object limiter" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Object limiter and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Object limiter until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
"The Sims HomeCrafter" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Sims HomeCrafter and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#The Sims HomeCrafter until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
"The Sims Third Installment (The Sims 3)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Sims Third Installment (The Sims 3) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#The Sims Third Installment (The Sims 3) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
"Goth Family" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Goth Family and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Goth Family until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)