Talk:Newsboys
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Newsboys article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk:Duncan Phillips (musician)
[edit]Content below is transcluded from the above talkpage, which is now a redirect to here. The relevant article is a redirect to this article.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Duncanphillipsmorroco.jpg
[edit]Image:Duncanphillipsmorroco.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Duncanphillipslive2.jpg
[edit]Image:Duncanphillipslive2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced section vs. BLP unreferenced section
[edit]I've re-made the change to remove the "BLP " prefix from the unreferenced section tag for the awards. My rationale is that the band article is not a BLP per WP:BLPGROUP, that BLP restrictions apply everywhere in article space anyways, and an awards section is not likely to be a magnet for BLP violations. Having said that, it is of course easiest to deal with if someone just has the time to go through and reference the awards, then we could remove the designation entirely. Jclemens (talk) 16:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- And I have removed it again. The group of people is not a corporation, it is a band. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- [1] Please check your facts before reverting other editors who provide a rationale. Jclemens (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- I give up. You don't know how to link correctly either. It doesn't change the need for the template and you clearly have no clue how to edit. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- [1] Please check your facts before reverting other editors who provide a rationale. Jclemens (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class Christian music articles
- High-importance Christian music articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christian music articles
- Mid-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- B-Class Pop music articles
- Unknown-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- B-Class Rock music articles
- Unknown-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles