Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One People's Project
Notability not established and heavily POV. Sarg 13:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the two news articles I added are enough to establish notability, but if not, I'll add more. Baxter2
- Keep Revolución 15:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I agree - Keep Celestianpower 15:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Ahhhh, much better now. Certainly enough to establish notability. Good job. I'm withdrawing the nomination. Sarg 16:09, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Badly written blubs like this one often turn into good articles. When you see one, you really need to consider using a cleanup tag instead of a VfD. If it doesn't improve, you can always VfD it later. Only serious nonsense ("Nobel Prize for Kickboxing") or obvious trivia ("Fred Fox is a popular high-school sophomore") should get an immediate VfD. ----Isaac R 19:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, I tried googling it and got no significant results. The way it was written, I found very difficult to know if it was real or a hoax/attack/prank. As for serious nonsense and obvious trivia, I usually use a Speedy delete. I only bring here things that merit some discussion. And, of course, I can commit errors :D Sarg 19:19, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry if my comments were too personal. I'm just repeating my usual concern that people use the VfD process for every content issue. ----Isaac R 20:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, I tried googling it and got no significant results. The way it was written, I found very difficult to know if it was real or a hoax/attack/prank. As for serious nonsense and obvious trivia, I usually use a Speedy delete. I only bring here things that merit some discussion. And, of course, I can commit errors :D Sarg 19:19, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Appear to be of some interest.Capitalistroadster 23:38, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)