Jump to content

Talk:Ely, Cambridgeshire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEly, Cambridgeshire has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
December 4, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
February 12, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

GA check

[edit]

I am working my way through the Good articles listed at Places; having a quick look to see if they still meet the Good article criteria. I have landed on this article. After I've had a quick look, I'll leave a note here indicating if I have concerns or not.

In general, I see the process as this: 1) Give the article a quick look to see if there are obvious issues: maintenance tags, unsourced sections, excessive media, etc, resolving any minor issues as I do so; 2) If I have concerns, open a GAR to see how serious those concerns are, resolving them myself if they are not serious; 3) If during the GAR I feel that there is significant work to be done (more than I can or am willing to do myself), I will put the GAR on hold and notify the main contributors.

My aim and intention is to keep the article listed - I would rather the article was improved and kept listed than the article is delisted. Where a delisting seems likely due to the amount or nature of work needed being greater than I am able to do alone, and the main contributors are unavailable or unable for whatever reason to do the work, then appropriate WikiProjects will be notified at least seven days before a delisting would take place. SilkTork ✔Tea time 21:26, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Captions are longer than recommended in WP:Captions, a GA criteria. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are some short sub-sections and short paragraphs, which are discouraged per WP:Layout, a GA criteria. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY Other than the two quibbles above, the article is presentable. The prose is clear and readable, the statements are richly cited to a range of good sources, and the information is dealt with in manageable sections, with nothing too detailed nor too brief. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ely, Cambridgeshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Ely, Cambridgeshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name Section

[edit]

Hello there! I've just edited the name section to add what I've found recently, by looking at some of the local histories. I've spoken to the person referenced in source 10 on the main page, Mac Dowdy, and he's going to let me know if there are any better sources that he can find than the interview with him. While his work is still available, he is now registered blind, and it is thus quite hard for him to read his notes.

I've been told that a lot of his work still lives at Cambridge University Architecture Department and the Cambridge university library. If anyone would like to help me with the saga of following up the Elysium claim, that would be most appreciated. I will be speaking with Mac further if anyone wishes for me to ask further questions.


Ta,

--Apparently j (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camden

[edit]

The note "Ipsa vero Elye urbs est non-exigua, nec sua sane vel elegentia vel frequentia praedicanda, utpote ob uliginosum situm, coelo parum salubri" which Google translates as "The city is no small for Elias, nor the frequency of his or elegentia or, indeed, be preached, for instance because of wet site, wholesome little heaven". Is this Google translation useful to anyone?--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google translates it *slightly* better today, but I think the meaning is closer to "But Ely herself is not strictly a city, nor can her elegance nor crowds reasonably be proclaimed, for due to her marshy site, the airs are not very healthy." 86.26.33.25 (talk) 03:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eels

[edit]

Regarding: "Problems also remain, as pointed out by historian Mac Dowdy, as the word eel (or similar) did not exist at the time of the founding of Ely" This is fairly obvious nonsense. Ely has seen human occupation since the neolithic but we have no idea what those people called it. But the city of Ely as we know it was created by the Anglo-Saxons who certainly did have a word for eel. See for example the entry for eel (n.) in the Online Etymological Dictionary: "Old English æl 'eel', from Proto-Germanic *ælaz." Jayarava (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ely,_Cambridgeshire&oldid=1207103640"