Talk:Loch Ness Monster

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loch Ness Monster article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 31 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 31, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 26, 2016	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 2, 2004, May 2, 2005, May 2, 2006, April 21, 2012, and April 21, 2019.

Folklore Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cryptozoology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland High‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal High‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

April 19 to 25, 2015 (6th)

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Better picture needed?

File:Hoaxed photo of the Loch Ness monster.jpg The introductory picture, copied here, is of low quality (out of focus), and quite old (1934!). A better quality and more recent photograph should be provided. Opinions? 2A00:23C6:54D3:DA01:A02F:5E5C:EE34:8258 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is the first. Slatersteven (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A good fatih editor removed the picture citing copyright concerns. However the author M. A. Wetherell of the picture died in 1939 (hence any copyright has expired since 2009) according to Wikipedia.[1]. The authorship and copyright information needs to be updated in the file details, but I do not know how to do it. 86.133.224.25 (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think something else is going on, besides a "good faith editor's" actions. This article used to have the entire "Surgeon's Photo," but when I look through the history to find it again, They were all replaced by a photo of the Loch Ness Monster Roller Coaster in Virginia. So I wondered if somebody had replaced the original photo with a hoax photo. But the trouble with this is that the roller coaster photo doesn't have a history of an earlier version. (It's called Lochnessmonster.jpg.) So somebody must have deleted the original photo from WikiMedia Commons and put another photo in its place. (I don't know if it's possible to delete a photo from WikiMedia Commons, so I may be all wrong here.)

Anyway, does anyone know where I can find a copy of the full original photo? I believe I know how to fix this if I have the photo.

"fix it"? we do not "Improve" images. Slatersteven (talk) 10:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

that a group of Nessies or loch ness monsters is called a choir, as in a choir of Nessies. 12.71.95.250 (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per WP:V. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Update

Hello, I am starting an update for 2023 under the "Searches" section to include information about a 90th anniversary hi tech search done in late August 2023. IntegrityForever (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Bear in mind Facebook pages, tweets, blog posts, Youtube videos, and the Loch Ness Exploration website, and The New York Post and similar tabloids are not reliable WP:FRIND sources for an update. However Deutsche Welle would be a good source. As for the WP:SENSATIONAL claims of a 'new sighting', this may be most helpful. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. IntegrityForever (talk) 21:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, nice summary. - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! IntegrityForever (talk) 22:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how long does loch ness monster live 138.75.45.157 (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask an RS, Slatersteven (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOve

Why was this moved (and protected) without discusion< Slatersteven (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax page is questionable

The picture is listed as being "known to be a hoax," but when I looked up the article cited, it comes from a self-published website that specializes in sensational content. He gives no citations and there is no way to verify that it is a hoax. If the picture is truly a hoax, there should be a more reliable source to demonstrate that. Mfolkers2000 (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion that happened above. Here is the link. Lorstaking (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

loch ness monster

the loch ness monster aka Nessie is real in some books they say a family created a robot Nessie but I think Nessie is real. 2602:FABE:3:371:65EE:D149:ACDE:27D3 (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is about Nessie, not Terror of the Zygons. Slatersteven (talk) 17:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reproduction

Were such a creature to exist, how could it be a unique one? Would not it die, as all creatures do? And how could it procreate? For sexual engenderment, males and females would exist.50.43.163.51 (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]