User talk:Ypacaraí

Subpages

deletion of Korea Scout Association from South Korea

Why did you remove Korea Scout Association from South Korea? It is related, it is not vandalism, and you gave no reason as to why you removed it. Chris 03:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think such article is suitable to keep a link on South Korea. If you think Korea Scout Association need s a link on South Korea, please put the link again. I will never remove it. I think someone else will remove it. -- Ypacaraí 04:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verification for #wikipedia-en-vandalism

Hi, sorry, I can't verfiy your request when you're not online. I have verified that you're on the list and that you were identified, but I can't invite you now. Ask me (or any of the other people on this list) when you're online and we'll do it for you. Sorry about the inconvenience! --Joann e B 16:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't realised I wasn't opped in those channel when I tried to invite you. You shouldn't have any trouble getting into the channels now. --Joann e B 16:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfD

On 22-Jan, you tagged the redirect Sea of korea for deletion, but you did not list it at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. I have added it to that page for discussion. You may wish to add a comment there if you still wish to see this redirect deleted. In the future, if you nominate a redirect for deletion, please list it. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. -- JLaTondre 02:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I forgot to add. Thank you for your help! --Ypacaraí 00:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Momoe Yamaguchi

My source stated that her father is a Korean, and her mother is Japanese. The alternative source I have provided shows that she is of mixed Zainichi descent (cached version, I have highlighted her name [1], and other Zainichis also included Akiko Wada, an undisputed Zainichi in your eyes. Please show me a source to support that she is not a Zainichi, and that it is a rumour, if you strongly believe otherwise. And I would once again urge you not to critcise my efforts as "useless", it is against Wikipedia:Civility. I have already explained. Thanks. Mr Tan 02:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you must show us a reliable source if you insist. Sources you have presented are almost worthless and not more than gossips. --Ypacaraí 03:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here they are, yahoo search results [2] and sources [3] [4][5]. If you are still unconvinced, I think you better personally read The Straits Times article yourself or WP:RS, by whatever extreme means, even coming to Singapore yourself just to see it, I don't care. Add it back, or remove it if you wish, for I have nothing more to give. To me, I have proven my own point to the best, and I have no more reservations. Happy? Mr Tan 12:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just helping you not to waste your time. As usual sources you brings are worthless. Stop messing up my talk page and that article. --Ypacaraí 13:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not for you to judge what I should or should not do. You are the one wasting my very own precious time and blood, not the reverse. And I am very astonished of your crude and hostile attitude of yours, for I do not understand where and why I have offended you. I have no more to say. Full stop. Mr Tan 16:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Show valuable source at article's discuttion page or keep reverting. Do not bring here worthless trash anymore. --Ypacaraí

I will not revert nor will I show any sources, at least for now. I have lost interest on this for now, thanks to you. And one more crude words out from you from now on, such as using the words trash in such contexts, I will not hesitate to send you to RfC on the basis of Wikipedia:Civility. I can work with you only if you at least change your basic etiquette. I am really beginning to get pissed off by your inflamatory remarks. Mr Tan 02:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my words but I'm really fed up with your discussion manner. You don't learn what is valuable source in Wikipedia and what is not. You have lost interest on this? Well, unlike geographical and political problem between Japan and Korea, I really don't care whether she has korean ancestry or not. I've neven been a fan of her. But I believe that I've seen much information about her ancestry in Japanese and your claim is laughable. Clinging her ancestry theme is waste of your time and I wanted to let you know about it. --Ypacaraí 03:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright, would you like me to scan out the article and show it in front of your own eyes? I agree that I do not wish to harp anymore on this minor matter, especially in view of the doubt about her ancestry you spurred up. However do take note that my way of citing sources is inspired by User:Johnleemk, who uses national newspapers to cite sources. Perhaps you can check out how he cite sources using newspapers[6]. I have asked initially asked him on the verifiability of newspapers as sources, and here was his reply: [7][8]. Perhaps this might enlighten you on how I judge upon what are reliable sources (see WP:RS). Mr Tan 05:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi, Ypacaraí, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 03:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tsushima Island

Konbanwa ! I dont understand your comments : rv such surrrender doesn't appear in Japanese and Korean history books http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tsushima_Island&diff=104715360&oldid=104635137

Zenzen wakarimasen !

On June 19, 1419, the recently-abdicated King Taejong of Joseon ordered his trusted general Yi Jong Mu to clear the island of the Wokou pirates, using a fleet of 227 vessels and 17,000 soldiers. So Sadamori surrendered to Joseon Kingdom, on September 29, 1419 and Tsushima became a Korean tributary island. Are you sure about what you've written above? 1) Look at the picture then :

General Yi Jong Mu

We can clearly see that Japanese peoples were kneeling down to General Yi Jong Mu and his officers.

and have a look on the following Link [9] : They wrote : "The war that ensued cost more than 3,800 lives on the both parties, and ended with the surrender of the Tsushima lord on Sept. 29."

2) Why have you deleted informations concerning Tsushima written in a Korean book calledSamguk Sagi?? According to the Samguk Sagi, in February 408 (7th year of Silseong Maripkan), the king of Silla heard that the Japanese had set up a base in Tsushima, so as to invade the Korean kingdom ^[1], ^[2]. You don't have a NPOV, slightly pro-Japanese and i can understand that. Regards. Mata kondo !Whlee 19:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dokdo RM poll

Hey, could you participate in a new poll for Dokdo? The candidates include Liancourt Rocks, Takeshima, and the new Takeshima/Dokdo variations suggested by user:Macgruder. I'm informing you because you voted on the last poll. Thanks. (Wikimachine 18:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ypacaraí. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ypacaraí. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ [[10]
^ [11]

[hamel-1] [[10]

[koreandb-2] [11]

[1]

[2]