Talk:Year 2038 problem

This article was nominated for deletion on May 2, 2022. The result of the discussion was Snow keep.

Time Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Time zone is irrelevant

The article states that that the problem occurs at a certain moment UTC. I think this is incorrect. The problem is insensitive to timezone settings. The reference to timezone should be removed. The problem itself will occur first in the place that celebrates new year first. It is possible to mention UTC in a second order context such as 'Computers that have their clock set to UTC and show local time to end users will be affected when the overflow occurs in timezone UTC'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilberth (talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Unix clock is measured against UTC, so the problem happens at a particular time on the UTC clock. David Malone (talk) 07:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The term "bug" seems to be out of place

Why is this being called a bug when this is entirely by design, known and resolved if you switch to modern systems using 64b time_t?

A bug would suggest an unintended/unforseen behavior, the "2k38 problem" has been a known limitation of 32b unix time since it's inception and was a presumably conscious decision balancing the needs and the limitations of hardware/storage at the time with the understanding that there was plenty of time for systems to grow to a point where using 64b time_t was feasible (as it is now more than 15 years before we reach the "deadline"). --Keeper of the Keys (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even just for internal consistency, I changed the link to Time formatting and storage bugs to show as time storage problem. With few exceptions, the page uses the word problem and not bug. --JimN48997 (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why signed?

Why is this a signed 32 bit integer? Is there any particular reason? 188.147.100.26 (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that times before the epoch can be stored. David Malone (talk) 13:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional citations?

In Jan. 2024 Year 2038 problem has received the "Needs more citations" flag. It's a brief article with 29 citations and most of them seem reliable at a glance. This page recently received an influx of views due to being linked by a comment on a popular Reddit post. Now, has it been flagged because many if not most or all citations are news articles, or what? Warm Yellow Sunflower (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zerbu added {{More citations needed}} on 5 January 2024, without any specific details in his edit summary, nor a topic on this talk page. In my opinion there are sufficient citations for an article of this size, and all citations are sufficiently reliable. I share User:Warm Yellow Sunflower's confusion about exactly why User:Zebru added this template? Unless User:Zerbu or others jump into this talk to share their concerns, I recommend that {{More citations needed}} be removed from this article in the next few weeks. -- netjeff (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the template. There's plenty of citations in the article. Sure there's some unsourced passages but that's pretty normal; doesn't necessitate a template. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 22:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]