Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Nicholas Bell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete --Carnildo 19:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Nicholas Bell

This obvious teen vanity page was tagged speedy. Since "obvious vanity" isn't a speedy criterion, I'm listing it here. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 09:08, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

SPEEDIED as Patent nonsense. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:55, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.--Silversmith 09:16, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; lame and the product of a hoaxer (see other VfDs today). Samaritan 11:53, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.